Perth startup Agworld lets farmers manage crop production cycles through the cloud
Startup BarBooks demonstrates there is value to creating platforms for small niche communities
BarBooks' accounting software has been designed to make it easier for barristers to manage and keep track of their bookkeeping. The platform has been created in a way that allows users to record specific information that they need to record and manage; features that big box business solutions like Xero, Quickbooks and MYOB don't have. For example, it allows barristers to record their time within the platform, meaning they can do their administrative tasks in real-time like invoicing a solicitor or direct client straight away as well as chase up fees that have not been paid. The mantra of the platform is that it is simple to use, intuitive to the needs of barristers and reliable for users who are mostly solo practitioners that may have a secretary or admin support person working with them.
"Barristers are sole practitioners, we run as sole traders," said Knackstredt, a barrister by profession. "We can't form companies. We do the work, we provide an invoice which sets up all the time that we spent on the matter and time is characterised as either an hourly, daily or for some specific applications a specialised fixed amount. Then we invoice it and we give them a particular amount of time to pay. We invoice to the solicitor most of the time."
"What you're selling is your time and your experience. The key point in that context is for you to be able to get your time down as accurately as possible and then have the tools to send invoices and record your time in a way where the solicitor can see what you've done so that they can discharge their obligations to their clients by being as detailed as possible with how their clients' money is being spent."
Across NSW and most of Australia, individual barristers are usually responsible for their own bookkeeping and administration. It is therefore important for them to minimise the time they have to spend on these types of tasks to enable them to work seamlessly each day. Having software also saves the barristers money on hiring support staff.BarBooks is a product of the CENSEA Software Corp of which both Knackstredt and Afshar are owners. The reason for this entity being the owner of the BarBooks asset is because in the long-term, the founders plan to build and create a number of products targeted towards barristers and other legal professionals.
This first product is a classed as a premium service by the company and will set barristers back around $60 per month which can also be purchased as an annual payment. The startup is pushing the latter payment preference by giving all those new clients that sign up paying the annual amount up front an iPad.
In Australia, there are between 5,000 and 6,000 barristers that are actively in the profession; and while that puts limitations on the revenue potential - it is still well into the millions - it allows the company to market itself in a very strategic and grassroots manner.
"We've actually taken a tiered marketing approach," said Afshar. "Basically, we have been working through our own contacts to get people onto the platform. Barristers is a small niche profession, so we have also started to work with a lot of clerks, who are the people that run the administration side of things for many barristers at their chamber based offices and who spend a lot of wasted time dealing with the issues arising from other accounting programs."
"In addition to that [grassroots strategy], we are doing some high level marketing activities showing [the industry] that this accounting software works, that it does what it's supposed to do and that it does this in a really easy and effective way."
Although the platform only launched a little over a month ago, BarBooks currently has 120 barristers actively using the system right now, many that have migrated away from other accounting packages. From this pool of users, the founders have begun to discover things that is now shaping the direction of the development of the platform, such as the resounding feedback that the application should be available for both mobile and tablet as they are two tools majority of barristers use on a daily basis.Though the startup is focusing on local dominance, both founders told Startup Daily that in places like the United States, barristers operate in a very similar fashion from an administrative perspective to Australia and New Zealand. As such, there does exist the potential to scale the business globally, with slight iterations to the software so that it suits local markets.
"At the moment, we just want to make sure that we've got a product that works, that does it well and is not trying [to service 100 different markets at once] and not executing in any of them well," said Afshar.
To get the execution right and migrate BarBooks' target market of barristers en masse, the founders said that a small round of seed funding in the vicinity of $250,000 to $350,000 is something they will start to have conversations about. These funds will most likely be used to explore markets beyond the borders of Australia.Expansion plans aside, what BarBooks shows us is that there is a trend towards creating more specialised solutions for niche industries, especially in the business-to-business sector. It is not just applicable to SaaS products either; we are seeing it in publishing with products like Tablo as well as many other verticals.
"Businesses want something that works exactly the way they want it to work," said Knackstredt. "Instead of providing a whole suite of things that customers don't necessarily want or need to use, startups can focus on addressing specific needs in order to capture a particular niche."
The rising popularity of Impact Investing means less barriers to funding for socially conscious startups
"We'll be originally be making investments in Australia and New Zealand" says Gourley. "But we're certainly going to be having both a local and global focus. It'll be fantastic to invest initially in all great Australian ideas because we do want to give local businesses and entrepreneurs and individuals access to this level of capital. I mean a $100 million impact investment fund is one of the biggest in the country. Funds by VCs that fund startups at the moment, (the ones on the bigger side of things) are still only around $20 million in size. That's not sending a message out there that we want to back Australian ideas. $100 million is. That's our starting point."
"We want this to be a billion dollar fund not just $100 million. We want to be a billion dollar fund investing in Australian businesses, particularly ones that have a social environmental angle outcome to them. We see that now's the time to do that, to try to create change for the future".
It's certainly a grand vision and I would agree that the taste and interest in socially impactful businesses has grown significantly over the last five years. However, labelling $20 million funds as not sending a strong message that people are behind Australian startups is perhaps a little harsh, especially as some of those local funds have played pivotal roles in now global startups like Safety Culture, Canva, Culture Amp, Shoes of Prey and strong local performers like GoCatch and Airtasker. Impact Investing is becoming more prominent across the country and take a number of different forms. There are retail funds like Australian Ethical Super and Future Super; there are wholesale funds like the soon-to-launch Impact Investment Fund and The Impact Investing Group. We also have organisations like Renata Cooper's Forming Circles that invests small amounts of seed funding into small businesses and startups that have a social impact."As more funds become more successful, the mainstream will start to shift saying 'You know what, I am going to invest my self managed super into that fund because I'm going to get a return but also I'm doing a good thing," says Gourley.
"Right now there is a very small group of people playing in this space. We all know each other, we're all in it for the right sort of reasons. If anything, it's good collaboration between the players in this space. So people like Berry Liberman from Impact Investing Group and Danny Almagor who owns Small Giants, are big players in this sector. They've been in it a bit longer than us. They're doing some amazing stuff and now if there's a way we can collaborate and help each other, then we're definitely open to that."
Featured image: Geoff Gourley. Source: Supplied.
Seedstars investment prize pool is $1.5 million this year with the additions of FinTech and TravelTech tracks

Digital cricket platform CricHQ raises US$10 million from Singapore based firm Tembusu Partners
Other than using the cash injection to upgrade the current platform and build additional features for its users, the company will begin to expand its reach geographically by making senior appointments to its operations team in India, the United Kingdom, South Africa and Pakistan. India is an obvious large focus for the startup considering it is the single biggest market in the world for the sport.
"[This] investment enables CricHQ to expand significantly and achieve our growth targets," said Baker. "An institutional investment of this significance, and the support of shareholders and clients such as New Zealand Cricket, validates our business strategy. CricHQ will benefit from Tembusu's experience and network in Asia, and is based in Singapore; the ideal gateway to our key markets."In addition to being supported by key industry bodies such as New Zealand Cricket, CricHQ has also had significant support from the New Zealand Government, with it being viewed from very early on as a key home-grown innovation and digital product with enormous export potential.
"Tembusu believes that CricHQ's business model is highly scalable and it has a huge opportunity to become the world's leading online repository of cricket information," said Andy Lim , Chairman of Tembusu Partners. "We are proud to partner CricHQ in its exciting growth journey."
Startups in creative industries invited to pitch to investors at Creative3 competition
Image: Sandra Mau, Founder & CEO TradeMarkVision & Anna Rooke, CEO of QUT Creative Enterprise Australia. Credit: Erika Fish, QUT
Kano wants to help kids learn how to put together a computer and then program it
LeadPages closes $27 million Series B round, but has not yet spent money raised in former rounds
Image: LeadPages CEO Clay Collins.
Australian startup Flirtey and NASA team to execute the first FAA-approved drone deliveries in America
Adelaide startup Little Birdy is leveraging ibeacon technology to enhance the nightlife experience
Sydney startup Boxbird picks up where Rocket Internet’s SpaceWays left off
Image: Ryan Catzel, Christie Whitehill, Rich Atkinson. Source: Provided.
StartupAUS appoints Peter Bradd as its first CEO
Brisbane startup StreetEats wants to streamline the street food scene by letting customers order through an app
Image: Michael Sive & Chris Illuk. Source: Provided.
You can’t sit with us: Do coaches and MLMs have a place in the startup ecosystem?
To grow rapidly, you need to make something you can sell to a big market. That's the difference between Google and a barbershop. A barbershop doesn't scale. For a company to grow really big, it must (a) make something lots of people want, and (b) reach and serve all those people. Barbershops are doing fine in the (a) department. Almost everyone needs their hair cut. The problem for a barbershop, as for any retail establishment, is (b). A barbershop serves customers in person, and few will travel far for a haircut. And even if they did the barbershop couldn't accommodate them. Writing software is a great way to solve (b), but you can still end up constrained in (a). If you write software to teach Tibetan to Hungarian speakers, you'll be able to reach most of the people who want it, but there won't be many of them. If you make software to teach English to Chinese speakers, however, you're in startup territory. Most businesses are tightly constrained in (a) or (b). The distinctive feature of successful startups is that they're not.If we use this as a guide, it can be concluded that coaches are not startups, though a coaching platform that has been designed to reach a massive market could be. MLM based companies are startups as they are designed to grow quickly and service a mass audience. However, the network of 'founders' within these organisations would not be considered startups, they are technically just part of the sales and marketing strategy. Investors love startups in the MLM industry According to recent data from AngelList, there are 34,000 individual investors and venture capital firms that have actively invested in or are looking to invest in the MLM space. Some of those people include UBER founder Travis Kalanick and Eventbrite cofounder, Kevin Hartz. In April last year, entertainment and rewards focused MLM startup Viggle closed a USD$35 million round of capital, and hair extension MLM startup VIXXENN which is experiencing rapid growth at the moment attracted seed funding from firms like Brooklyn Bridge Capital and Corigin Ventures. The reason why investment in an MLM startup is so attractive is because 90% of the revenue made within a MLM environment goes directly to the company headquarters, thereby making MLM owners and investors very rich people. People like Donald Trump, Warren Buffet and Robert Kiyosaki are on record stating that it is a great industry (as an owner) to make money in. It just happens to be that the primary way they make that money is by selling the dream of owning of your own business by choosing which hours you work, and having access to unlimited marketing and technical infrastructure that will allow you to achieve your "dream lifestyle". Often, people join an MLM because they're passionate users of a product, which not only leads to advocacy, but also to the actual selling of the same dream sold to them. It is a growth strategy often seen as a turn-off by startup founders, mainly because they feel that the title of being a "founder" is something that, at least in some capacity, needs to be earned, and MLMs don't quite sync with that philosophy. A love-hate relationship with coaching Contrary to what the opening example in this article suggests, startups do actually engage with business coaches and mentors. Where technology startups founders differ to small business owners and other company owners, is that they prefer to seek these people out for themselves. Like MLM, the Coaching Industry is one of the fastest growing in the world, however unlike MLM there are no dominant players in the space. (There is ActionCoach which is the largest business coaching company in the world, but ActionCoach itself is actually an MLM). The industry is growing annually at a rate of 7.8% according to IBIS World, and in the US alone the sector is worth $1 billion to the economy. So while coaching may be a great industry to make money in and be entrepreneurial, those in the space technically would not be considered startups. Therein lies the distaste, and why startup founders are so quick to jump on unsolicited pitches and shut them down. Is it nice to do that? Probably not, but most training in the life and business coaching industry is geared around helping a particular type of client; and fast-growth, highly scalable tech companies are most definitely not part of the curriculum. You can't sit with us The debate about who is able to participate within the startup ecosystem is not too dissimilar to the small business vs. startups policy discussions that we have written about on Startup Daily. In fact, I am going to argue that defining what is a startup and highlighting what type of products and services truly support startups (i.e. looking at who does and does not actually belong in the ecosystem) is just as critical to policy formation for the space as defining the difference between what a startup and small business is. A startup ecosystem progresses based on its general culture and resources. Startup ecosystems help transform a nation's economy and create jobs of the future. In order to do that successfully, participants within the space need to be collectively working towards that goal. Individuals and organisations that do not align with that goal should not be participants within the ecosystem. The trouble with coaching and MLM is that, at its core, they both promote financial selfishness above national economic growth. That is not to say that: (a) there is anything wrong with wanting to make as much money as you can and live the life that you want; or (b) that startup founders are not financially selfish. The point being made is that in order to be part of the ecosystem, you need to be contributing to the community in a meaningful way. The vast majority of coaches out there don't understand the space properly because they confuse the term 'startup' with 'starting a business'; and MLMs are too focused on growing their own ecosystem to increase personal commissions to consider the bigger picture of what startups are trying to achieve. Although proactive exclusion from the startup ecosystem is not what I am suggesting, I do think that it is worthwhile for the community to assess who actively makes a meaningful contribution and who doesn't. There are far too many individuals and organisations out there speaking on behalf of the startup ecosystem that are in fact, not startups or supporters of startups, and that is a problem, as it sends mixed messages to the government and causes the launch of messy government policy.
Tech in Asia raises $4 million to build more features for its community
Source Legal Online wants to lower barriers to legal services through a monthly subscription model
Stockspot: A flagship investment for FinTech venture capitalists, the Heap brothers
"Most people stuff themselves up when they invest because they invest according to their behavioural biases," says Brycki. "We make these types of bad decisions because our brain makes us think a certain way about investing when we shouldn't. A lot of our work around educating consumers is about improving the financial intellect of our clients and educating them about this sort of thing. That's why we're publishing a lot of research and writing a lot of content around helping people make better decisions."
"I guess the reason why we're putting a lot of this content and research out as well is because we want to be seen as the consumer champions in finance, the company that is actually standing up for all the little guys out there that seem to get ripped off."
This sentiment is evident when you analyse the type of research activities Stockspot has been undertaking. Last November the company released the Fat Cat Funds Report which highlighted dodgy activities in the sector. This was well received by customers and potential clients, but according to Brycki, the industry hated it. The advantage that Stockspot has over traditional players in the space is that it has no legacy business it needs to protect, and can therefore afford to be a little polarising with its marketing efforts.
Image: Chris Brycki, Founder, Stockspot. Source: Supplied.
Divvy Parking raises $2.5 million Series A round to expand its team
Bionic Vision Technologies looking to raise $10 million to fund clinical trials of bionic eye implant
Veil Hijab has created a climate-adapting hijab to keep Muslim women cool and dry
